07.28.07

Nikon Blogola: Controlling the blogosphere one camera at a time

Posted in Uncategorized at 6:00 pm by Candice

Consumers and marketers alike are learning how to navigate the blogosphere. As a relatively new medium, blogs are enabling corporations to devise new ways of marketing products. The newness of blogs is also enabling companies to circumvent conventional marketing ethics to promote products. Blogola is a primary example of this, as influential bloggers are being compensated to review new products.

Nikon is using blogola to promote its D80 camera. The company’s blogger outreach strategy is to loan D80 camera (valued at $1000 and up) to leading bloggers in hopes of getting strong reviews that will help the camera sell to amateur photographers. As with payola in the recording industry, blogola smells like bribery. While Nikon is loaning their cameras to bloggers who participate in the program, the bloggers are given an opportunity to later purchase the camera at a reduced price (a major perk by any photographer’s standards).

Naked Conversations discusses the FUD Barrier. According to Scoble and Israel, FUD stands for fear, uncertainty, and doubt. The authors explain that companies have historically used FUD tactics to demote competing products and persuade consumers to purchase their product. Today, the authors write, FUD is used to sway corporations against blogging.

The first FUD barrier for blogging that Scoble and Israel discuss is negative comments. Having unflattering reviews posted on a message board for current and potential customers to see is deemed unhealthy for business. Conversely, blogs are said to give companies a false sense of the conversation surrounding a product. The authors quote Mike Torres of Microsoft with saying; “People are a lot more polite when they know you are listening.”

Torres’s sentiment explains why blogola doesn’t work. When companies agree to compensate bloggers for writing about their product, the blogger’s perspective is softened. Jack Jaffe’s April 29th blog post entitled D80 Blogger Outreach Rocks is laced with praises for Nikon:

“I have to tell you that in my humble opinion, this has been the best example of blogger outreach I have either experienced (first hand) or read about.”

Jaffe’s May 25th blog post Thank you Nikon! is laudatory as well:

“I just wanted to thank Nikon for selecting me to participate in their blogger outreach program. With photographs like this (which I would never have had before), I now have loyalty to a brand which quite frankly I had never considered before.”

Now, I admit that the picture Jaffe is referring to is clear, but it’s hard to not wonder whether Jaffe or any other bloggers selected for this campaign have overlooked problem areas of the camera because they are getting clear pictures. Moreover, I wonder whether these influential bloggers are experienced enough to give a complete review of a high-grade digital camera. While the D80 is built for amateurs, digital photography is a very detailed medium and the most involved enthusiasts will want to do more with their cameras than take pictures that can be uploaded to flickr.

While the ethics are questionable, I’ll also admit that Nikon’s D80 blogger outreach is a smart strategy for controlling the blogosphere. Nikon has opened the door to both positive and negative reviews, but by giving noteworthy bloggers a noteworthy product, Nikon is minimizing its chances of being criticized in consumer-generated media.

07.21.07

Whole Foods: Is WOMMA Missing A WOM Opportunity for WOM Ethics?

Posted in Revelations at 2:20 pm by Candice

The Word of Mouth Marketing Association (WOMMA) released its Ethics Code in 2005 to expose “bad-willed marketers [running] deceptive and dishonest marketing programs.” To achieve this, WOMMA built its Ethics Code on the following six principles: (1) Consumer protection and respect are paramount; (2) Honesty of Relationship, Opinion, and Identity; (3) Respect the rules of the venue; (4) Manage relationships with minors; (5) Promote honest downstream communication; and (6) Protect privacy and permission.

Earlier this month, it was discovered that Whole Foods CEO John Mackey was anonymously posting defamatory information about a rival company on a message board. Mackey violated the first 3 principles of WOMMA’s Ethics Code. By posting under a assumed identity, Mackey took control away from consumers to give biased (and possibly false) information that highlighted his company and downplayed his competitor. Mackey didn’t disclose his relationship to Whole Foods and his phony identity misled the public about who was really communicating. Had WOMMA’s code been released after July 2007, readers would think the document was in direct response to Mackey’s actions.

The Whole Foods scandal highlights the need for ethical marketing standards in the age of digital influence where true identities are usually hidden from the public. I won’t use this post to argue whether Mackey violated ethical codes. (That answer is obvious.) Instead, I will use this post to present findings of a quick and dirty conversation map I conducted to determine whether this latest case of “CEOs Gone Wild” brought attention to WOMMA’s Ethics Code.

Why a conversation map? Well, WOMMA’s website doesn’t mention the Whole Foods incident. This issue would help bring attention to the Ethics Code and WOMMA itself, but association leaders aren’t using specific ethics cases to advance their mission. After finding this, I was curious to see how well accepted or known WOMMA’s code is. I found the following:

• A Google search for WOMMA Mackey produced approximately 781* results, most of which were blogs. A July 12th blog post on A Shel of My Former Self discusses the Whole Foods incident and need for ethical blogging, but makes no mention of WOMMA. There were 23 comments associated with this post and in 3 of the comments the author calls for WOMMA intervention. A blog post on Consumer Generated Media (CGM) from July 12th was the only blog that provides direct mention of WOMMA in the post and links to their webpage. The CGM blog is very influential with a Social Meter score of over 2,000.

• A search for John Mackey Whole Foods in Google Blog Search produced approximately 2,722** results. The first 20 results were dedicated to the Whole Foods message board incident. While many of these posts mentioned ethics, there were no conversations regarding WOMMA or their Ethics Code.

• A search for Whole Foods in YouTube produced 378 results when sorted by upload date. The first two pages contained videos released within the past week and 4 of these videos are related to Mackey’s mistake. Similar to blog posts, the related videos discuss ethics, but don’t mention WOMMA.

Findings of this limited conversation map seem to suggest that controversy surrounding Whole Foods and the heightened attention to word of mouth ethics is not brining much attention to WOMMA. WOMMA mentions on their ethics page that they want to raise awareness of unethical practices to push “bad-willed” businesses out. However, the association isn’t capitalizing on relevant events that show need for ethical codes in word of mouth marketing. Perhaps this is WOMMA’s method for not being viewed a regulatory force as mentioned on their FAQ page. While this is commendable, highlighting such incidents would help WOMMA educate consumers, businesses, and advertisers about unethical marketing practices.

* Advanced Search Options: English Only; Results from the last 3 months
** Advanced Search Options: English only; July 13, 2007-July 20, 2007

07.14.07

Net Promoter Score: Don’t Sleep on the Passives

Posted in Uncategorized at 5:56 am by Candice

The effect of marketing plans and new product incentives pale in comparison to the opinion of a trusted friend, relative, or colleague. According to Fred Reichheld’s Ultimate Question, positive word of mouth is key for driving good profits, while negative referrals cast doubt on a company’s integrity. Reichheld’s Net Promoter Score (NPS) helps companies ask customers whether or not services rendered are worthy of word of mouth promotion.

The NPS framework characterizes customers as a promoter, passive, or detractor. Promoters have the highest repurchase and customer loyalty rates of the three groups. Passives follow promoters with lower repurchase rates and excitement about the product. Detractors create negative publicity for a company because they’ve experienced poor customer service and want to warn others about the company’s practices.

On the NPS referral scale, promoters are “extremely likely” (9-10) to recommend service to someone else. Detractors dominate the scale (0-6) as “not at all likely” to recommend a company’s service to another person. However, both groups are able to generate equal amounts of word of mouth about the service received. Reichheld fails to give a good description about purchasing behaviors of passive customers. From the explanation given, I get the impression that passive customers have experienced good and bad service, but they still support the company. Passive customers aren’t exactly in the middle of the NPS scale (7-8), but they’re in a position where they can become either strong promoters or detractors.

The NPS framework can extend to social services as well. In health education, positive word of mouth is your profit. Health educators want to deliver a quality program to community members, so that people not only return, but also bring other community members along.

I held an emergency preparedness training this morning and spoke with three participants who’ve been enjoying the program, but recently had a bad experience with an instructor. One student began the conversation positively by saying “Candice, thank ‘Bob’ for teaching Monday’s course for us.” Another student chimed in with negative comments about Bob’s teaching style. This sparked negative comments from a third person. By the end of the conversation, all three participants were complaining.

This experience made me think about the power detractors have in influencing peers to defect. I consider the participant who wanted me to thank Bob as a passive participant – he had some reservations, but was willing to overlook them due to his overall good experience in the program. Had detractors not been present, I wonder if he would have continued to give Bob accolades.

Consumers are greatly influenced by word-of-mouth referrals. It’s harder to convert a detractor into a promoter. After determining NPS, business leaders should take steps to identify passive customers before they fall into the clutches of detractors. Leaders should work to understand needs and preferences of passive customers to create a better product that turns them into loyal promoters.

07.07.07

Too purfect for my blog

Posted in Chapter Reviews, Revelations at 6:06 pm by Candice

In the closing chapters of Naked Conversations, authors Robert Scoble and Shel Israel provide dos and don’ts of blogging. In chapter 10, public relations professionals are advised to enter the blogosphere as a human and not as a traditional marketer, as true bloggers and consumers can easily spot forced or contrived writing. The authors write that mass marketing has a very limited place in the blogosphere and that consumers respond better to blogs that are managed by people speaking in their own voice.

The ability to speak in your own voice is what distinguishes blogs from traditional marketing and journalism. Blogs are not peer reviewed or edited by the higher-ups within an organization. With blogs, we’re finally allowed to speak in a conversational tone, misspell a few words, and use ellipses over and over again. I’m relatively new to the blogosphere, with “Is this thing on?” being my first blog. As a newbie, finding my blog voice has been the most challenging, particularly because I’m writing for academic purposes where accuracy and logic count.

Academic brainwashing has worked a number on me. Finding a misspelled word makes me cringe. Reading prose that rambles is upsetting. While I’m getting used to links, I’m convinced this isn’t the right way to cite a source. This isn’t to say that I don’t make these mistakes. I just try really hard to not make these mistakes. What you’re reading right now is actually my second draft of this post, which I typed in Microsoft Word and pasted to my blog (sorry readers, now the blog magic is gone). At this point in life, it’s hard to shut off the “i before e except after c” voice and write as a free spirit.

To Scoble and Israel, the desire to be the perfect PR professional (or in my case health communicator) who shields her imperfections is wasted on the blogging community. In this digital communication age, people want to see that humans and not online characters are on the other end of the gadgets. In addition to speaking in your own voice, Scoble and Israel encourage bloggers to reveal their humanity by telling the truth, acknowledging mistakes, correcting mistakes, admitting when they don’t have the answer, and being transparent.

So, only after being born to a teacher who corrected every grammatical error I ever uttered, marrying a journalist, and spending semesters with Morris, Kiernan, and Twomey do they invent a form of communication where it’s okay to be human. Oh, how funny life can be. I’ll continue to search for my online voice and writing style through this blog and perhaps, a more personal blog. Maybe I’ll find the relaxed writing spirit I had as a child. Maybe I’ll lose the fear of mispelling misspelling a word and post directly into the editor.  Just maybe.